闢邪集
卷1
刻闢邪集序
J23nB120_p0047a02

天學初徵
J23nB120_p0047c02 J23nB120_p0047c03 J23nB120_p0047c04鍾子讀《易》於震澤之濱,有客扣廬而問曰:「吾聞子年J23nB120_p0047c05十二、三時,便以千古學脈為己任,闢釋老、閑聖道,今J23nB120_p0047c06三十餘載矣。足不窺戶外,不與名公大人交,亦不思J23nB120_p0047c07致身以事君,將安補於世道哉?且子不聞近世有天J23nB120_p0047c08主教乎?其人從大西來,一見我中國之書悉能通達。J23nB120_p0047c09▆亦闢佛而尊儒,與子意甚相符也。曷一共討究焉?」J23nB120_p0047c10鍾子欣而作曰:「有是哉!彼既從大西來,乃不袒釋而J23nB120_p0047c11袒儒。意者吾聖道晦而復明之機乎?願聞其旨。」客迺J23nB120_p0047c12出聖像,略說一冊以示之。鍾子讀甫竟,遂詬曰:「嘻!此J23nB120_p0047c13妖胡耳。陽排佛而陰竊其秕糠;偽尊儒而實亂其道J23nB120_p0047c14脈。請即以彼說攻之。彼云:『天主即當初生天、生地、生J23nB120_p0047c15神、生人、生物的一大主宰。』且問彼大主宰,有形質耶?J23nB120_p0047c16無形質耶?若有形質,復從何生?且未有天地時,住止J23nB120_p0047c17何處?若無形質,則吾儒所謂太極也。太極本無極,云J23nB120_p0047c18何有愛惡?云何要人奉事、聽候使令?云何能為福罰?J23nB120_p0047c19其不通者一也。且太極只是本具陰陽之理,是故動J23nB120_p0047c20而為陽、靜而為陰。陰陽各有善惡之致,故裁成輔相J23nB120_p0047c21之任獨歸於人。孔子曰:『人能弘道。』又曰:『為仁由己。』子J23nB120_p0047c22思曰:『致中和,天地位焉,萬物育焉。』《易》曰:『先天而天弗J23nB120_p0047c23違。』若如彼說,則造作之權,全歸天主。天主既能造作J23nB120_p0047c24神、人,何不單造善神、善人?而又兼造惡神、惡人以貽J23nB120_p0048a01累於萬世乎?其不通者二也。且天主所造,露際弗爾,J23nB120_p0048a02何故獨賜之以大力量、大才能?若不知其要起驕傲J23nB120_p0048a03而賜之,是不智也;若知其要起驕傲而賜之,是不仁J23nB120_p0048a04也。不仁不智,猶稱天主,其不通者三也。又露際弗爾,J23nB120_p0048a05既罰下地獄矣。天主又容他在此世界陰誘世人。曾J23nB120_p0048a06不如舜之誅四凶、封傲象也。其不通者四也。且天、地、J23nB120_p0048a07萬物既皆天主所造,即應擇其有益者而造之,擇其J23nB120_p0048a08有損者而弗造。或雖造而即除之。何故造此肉身?造J23nB120_p0048a09此風俗?造此魔鬼?以為三仇,而不能除耶?世間良工,J23nB120_p0048a10造器必美;或偶不美,必棄之。以至大、至尊、至靈、至聖J23nB120_p0048a11之真主,曾良工之不如?其不通者五也。孔子曰:『天何J23nB120_p0048a12言哉。』孟子曰:『天不言,以行與事示之而已矣。』今言古J23nB120_p0048a13時天主降下十戒。則與漢宋之封禪天書何異?惑世J23nB120_p0048a14誣民,莫此為甚。其不通者六也。又天主降生為人,傳J23nB120_p0048a15受大道。未降生前居在何處?若在天堂,則是天主依J23nB120_p0048a16天堂住。如何可說天主造成天堂?若言既造天堂、依J23nB120_p0048a17天堂住,如人造屋還即住屋。則未造天堂時,又依何J23nB120_p0048a18住?若無所依,則同太極;不應太極,依天堂住。福罰人J23nB120_p0048a19間,亦不應太極降生為人。其不通者七也。又天主既J23nB120_p0048a20降生後,彼天堂上為有本身?為無本身?若無本身,則J23nB120_p0048a21天上無主;若有本身,則濫佛氏真、應二身之說。而又J23nB120_p0048a22不及千百億化身之奇幻。其不通者八也。又謂天主J23nB120_p0048a23以自身贖天下萬世罪過,尤為不通。夫天主既其至J23nB120_p0048a24尊無比,慈威無量,何不直赦人罪,而須以身贖罪?未J23nB120_p0048b01審向誰贖之?其不通者九也。又既能以身贖人罪過,J23nB120_p0048b02何以不能使勿造罪?其不通者十也。又既云:『贖天下J23nB120_p0048b03萬世人罪』,而今猶有造罪墮地獄者,仍贖不盡。其不J23nB120_p0048b04通者十一也。吾儒謂堯舜之聖,不能掩其子之惡;孝J23nB120_p0048b05子慈孫,不能改幽厲之過。所以自天子至於庶人,壹J23nB120_p0048b06是皆以修身為本。而今天主既可贖人罪過,則人便J23nB120_p0048b07可恣意為惡,總待天主慈悲贖之。其不通者十二也。J23nB120_p0048b08遺下教規,謂只有一造物真主,至大、至尊,要人奉事、J23nB120_p0048b09拜祭。而盡抹殺天、地、日、月諸星。則與佛氏所稱『唯吾J23nB120_p0048b10獨尊』何異?陰倣其說,而陽排之。其不通者十三也。佛J23nB120_p0048b11氏雖曰『唯吾獨尊』,尚謂天、地、日、月、諸星,覆炤世間,有J23nB120_p0048b12大功德;護世鬼神保祐人間,宜思報效。今乃曰不當J23nB120_p0048b13拜祭,則專擅名利之惡甚於佛氏。其不通者十四也。J23nB120_p0048b14既不許輪迴之說,又云人之靈魂嘗在不滅,有始無J23nB120_p0048b15終。則轉積轉多,安置何所?其不通者十五也。若謂天J23nB120_p0048b16堂、地獄皆大,可以並容,何異佛氏之說?其不通者十J23nB120_p0048b17六也。又彼謂佛氏所稱三千大千華藏世界,人所不J23nB120_p0048b18見,便是荒唐。今彼所稱天堂、地獄又誰見之?其不通J23nB120_p0048b19者十七也。又謂天堂、地獄,雖然未見,卻是實理。則安J23nB120_p0048b20知三千華藏非實理乎?而苦破之,其不通者十八也。J23nB120_p0048b21又謂臨終一刻聽從天主教法,也還翻悔得轉,則與J23nB120_p0048b22佛氏臨終十念相濫。汝說要真,佛氏亦說要真。汝說J23nB120_p0048b23要依十戒,佛氏亦說要依十戒。汝說從自己身心上J23nB120_p0048b24實實做出來,佛氏亦說從自己身心上實實做出來。J23nB120_p0048c01汝說要真心實意痛悔力除,後來不敢再犯,佛氏亦J23nB120_p0048c02說要真心實意痛悔力除,後來不敢再犯。全偷佛氏J23nB120_p0048c03之說而又非之,其不通者十九也。又佛氏專明萬法J23nB120_p0048c04惟心,故凡事只靠一心。汝既專明萬法惟天主,則凡J23nB120_p0048c05事只靠一天主足矣。又何用從自己身心做出耶?若J23nB120_p0048c06仍要從身心做出,則權不獨在天主明矣。而妄立天J23nB120_p0048c07主,其不通者二十也。汝既要攻釋、道兩家,須搜其病J23nB120_p0048c08根,彼方心服。若謂要人施捨些錢財,備辦些齋飯,燒J23nB120_p0048c09化些紙張,便是功果,恐彼二氏亦未必心服。而汝又J23nB120_p0048c10仍教人奉事、拜禮天主聖像,與彼何異?其不通者二J23nB120_p0048c11十一也。吾儒謂『物物一太極,天命之謂性』,故人人可J23nB120_p0048c12以成位於中。至於尊卑、名位則森然不亂。故天子事J23nB120_p0048c13上帝,諸侯祭山川、社稷,大夫五祀,士祭其先。今既謂J23nB120_p0048c14天主至大至尊,又令家事而戶奉之,與佛、老二像何J23nB120_p0048c15異?而妄自表彰,以為不同,其不通者二十二也。吾故J23nB120_p0048c16曰『陽闢佛而陰竊之,偽尊儒而實壞之』者也。逐其人,J23nB120_p0048c17燬其書,禁天下不得存其像,庶不為中國之賊耳。聞J23nB120_p0048c18彼妖徒聰明能辯,必有以解吾徵者。吾將再徵之。」
J23nB120_p0048c19J23nB120_p0048c20J23nB120_p0048c21J23nB120_p0048c22J23nB120_p0048c23J23nB120_p0048c24天學初徵
天學再徵
J23nB120_p0049a02 J23nB120_p0049a03 J23nB120_p0049a04鍾子作《天學初徵》。客閱而笑曰:「甚矣!子之鹵莽也!乍J23nB120_p0049a05聞天說,曾未深究,遽謂不通而徵之。子且再閱《西來J23nB120_p0049a06意》、《三山論學記》及《聖教約言》,則不通者,乃在子而不J23nB120_p0049a07在彼矣。」鍾子取而細讀之,復為之徵如左。
J23nB120_p0049a08其言曰:「上天自東運行,而日、月、星、辰之天自西循逆J23nB120_p0049a09之。度數各依其則,次舍各安其位。倘無尊主幹旋主J23nB120_p0049a10宰,其間寧免無悖?譬如舟渡江海,上下風濤而無傾J23nB120_p0049a11蕩之虞。雖未見人,亦知一舟之中,必有掌舵智工」等。J23nB120_p0049a12徵曰:舟之渡江海也,舟必各一舵工。未聞一舵工而J23nB120_p0049a13遍操眾舟之上下者也。又操舟者必非造舟人也,謂J23nB120_p0049a14天惟一主,并造之,并運行之。可乎?
J23nB120_p0049a15其言曰:「凡物不能自成,必須外為者以成之。樓臺、房J23nB120_p0049a16屋不能自成,成於工匠之手;天地不能自成,成於天J23nB120_p0049a17主」等。徵曰:工匠之成房屋也,必有命之成者。天主之J23nB120_p0049a18成天地,孰命之耶?工匠成房屋,不能為房屋主。彼成J23nB120_p0049a19天地者,又烏能為天地主乎?
J23nB120_p0049a20其言曰:「天下之物極多、極盛,苟無一尊維持調護,不J23nB120_p0049a21免散壞。是故一家止有一長,一國止有一君,一人止J23nB120_p0049a22有一身,一身止有一首」等。徵曰:謂一身無二首,可也。J23nB120_p0049a23謂一身一首之外,別無他身他首,不可也;謂一家無J23nB120_p0049a24二長可也,謂一家一長之外別無他家他長,不可也;J23nB120_p0049b01謂一國無二君可也,謂一國一君之外更無他國他J23nB120_p0049b02君,不可也;謂一天無二主亦可也,謂一天一主之外J23nB120_p0049b03獨無他天他主,可乎?又一身雖惟一首,首必與四肢、J23nB120_p0049b04百骸俱生,非首生四肢、百骸也;一家雖惟一長,長必J23nB120_p0049b05與眷屬、僮僕並生,非長生眷屬、僮僕也;一國雖惟一J23nB120_p0049b06君,君必與臣佐、吏民俱生,非君生臣佐、吏民也。則一J23nB120_p0049b07天雖惟一主,主亦必與神、鬼、人、物並生,謂主生神、鬼、J23nB120_p0049b08人、物可乎?
J23nB120_p0049b09其言曰:「天主非天也,非地也,而高明博厚,較天地尤J23nB120_p0049b10甚。非鬼神也,而神靈鬼神,不啻非人也,而遐邁聖睿,J23nB120_p0049b11乃至無始無終,無處可以容載,而無所不盈充」等。徵J23nB120_p0049b12曰:既無所不盈充,則不但在天堂,亦遍在地獄也。不J23nB120_p0049b13但遍天、地,亦遍在神、鬼、人、獸、草、木、雜穢等處也。若謂J23nB120_p0049b14高居天堂,至尊無上,則盈充之義不成;若謂遍一切J23nB120_p0049b15處,則至尊之體不立。或救之曰:「天主之尊,如日在天,J23nB120_p0049b16光遍一切。雖遍而不失其尊,雖尊而光原自遍。」今再J23nB120_p0049b17徵曰:是仍有處所、有方隅、有形像也。日有形像,彼謂J23nB120_p0049b18天主造之。天主亦有形像,又誰之所造耶?
J23nB120_p0049b19其言曰:「吾天主,乃經所謂上帝也。」遂引〈頌〉、〈雅〉、《易傳》、《中J23nB120_p0049b20庸》等以證成之。徵曰:甚矣!其不知儒理也。吾儒所謂J23nB120_p0049b21天者,有三焉:一者、望而蒼蒼之天,所謂昭昭之多,及J23nB120_p0049b22其無窮者是也。二者、統御世間,主善罰惡之天,即《詩》J23nB120_p0049b23《易》、《中庸》所稱上帝是也。彼惟知此而已。此之天帝但J23nB120_p0049b24治世而非生世,譬如帝王但治民而非生民也。乃謬J23nB120_p0049c01計為生人、生物之主,則大繆矣。三者、本有靈明之性,J23nB120_p0049c02無始無終、不生不滅名之為天。此乃天地萬物本原,J23nB120_p0049c03名之為命。故中庸云:「天命之謂性。」天非蒼蒼之天,亦J23nB120_p0049c04非上帝之天也,命非諄諄之命,亦非賦畀之解也。孔J23nB120_p0049c05子曰:「五十而知天命。」正深證此本性耳,亦謂之中,故J23nB120_p0049c06曰:「喜、怒、哀、樂之未發謂之中。」中也者,天下之大本也。J23nB120_p0049c07亦謂之易,故曰:「易,無思也,無為也。寂然不動,感而遂J23nB120_p0049c08通天下之故。」亦謂之良知,故曰:「知至而后意誠。」亦謂J23nB120_p0049c09之不睹不聞,亦謂之獨,故曰:「戒慎乎其所不睹,恐懼J23nB120_p0049c10乎其所不聞。」君子必慎其獨,即孔子所言畏天命也。J23nB120_p0049c11亦謂之心,故曰:「學問之道無他,求其放心而已矣。」亦J23nB120_p0049c12謂之己,故曰:「君子求諸己。為仁由己而由人乎哉?」亦J23nB120_p0049c13謂之我,故曰:「萬物皆備於我矣。」亦謂之誠,故曰:「自誠J23nB120_p0049c14明,謂之性。」誠者天之道也。此真天地萬物本原,而實J23nB120_p0049c15無喜怒、無造作、無賞罰、無聲臭。但此天然性德之中,J23nB120_p0049c16法爾具足理氣體用,故曰:「易有太極,是生兩儀」等。然J23nB120_p0049c17雖云易有太極,而太極即全是易;如濕性為水,水全J23nB120_p0049c18是濕;雖云太極生兩儀,而兩儀即全太極;雖云兩儀J23nB120_p0049c19生四象,四象亦即全是兩儀;雖云四象生八卦,八卦J23nB120_p0049c20亦即全是四象。乃至八相盪而為六十四,六十四互J23nB120_p0049c21變而為四千九十六。於彼四千九十六卦之中,隨舉J23nB120_p0049c22一卦、隨舉一爻,亦無不全是八卦、全是四象、全是兩J23nB120_p0049c23儀、全是太極、全是易理者。譬如觸大海一波,無不全J23nB120_p0049c24體是水,全是濕性者。又如撒水銀珠,顆顆皆圓。故凡J23nB120_p0050a01天、神、鬼、人,苟能於一事一物之中,克見太極、易理之J23nB120_p0050a02全者,在天則為上帝,在鬼神則為靈明,在人則為聖J23nB120_p0050a03人,而統治、化導之權歸焉。倘天地未分之先,先有一J23nB120_p0050a04最靈、最聖者為大主,則便可有治而無亂,有善而無J23nB120_p0050a05惡,又何俟後之神靈、聖哲為之裁成輔相?而人亦更J23nB120_p0050a06無與天地合德,先天而天弗違者矣。彼烏知吾儒繼J23nB120_p0050a07天立極之真學脈哉!
J23nB120_p0050a08其言曰:「魂有三品:下名生魂,草木之魂是也;中名覺J23nB120_p0050a09魂,禽獸之魂是也。此二皆滅,亦云有始有終。卜名靈J23nB120_p0050a10魂,即人魂也。此魂不滅,亦云有始無終。」徵曰:靈與覺J23nB120_p0050a11異,則有始而無終。覺與生異,何皆有始而有終也?且J23nB120_p0050a12謂禽獸有覺而無靈,惟人為有靈者,現見世之愚人,J23nB120_p0050a13但念飲食、婬欲,他無所知,與禽獸何異?現見世有義J23nB120_p0050a14犬、義猴,捨身殉主、訴官理究,與人何異?故孟子亦云:J23nB120_p0050a15「人之所以異於禽獸者幾希,庶民去之,君子存之。」豈J23nB120_p0050a16可妄分一有終、一無終耶?
J23nB120_p0050a17其言曰:「周公、仲尼之論,孰有狎后帝而與之一者。設J23nB120_p0050a18匹夫自稱與天子同尊,其能免乎?地上民不可妄比J23nB120_p0050a19肩,地上君而可同天上帝乎?」徵曰:庶民不敢擬帝王J23nB120_p0050a20者,名位也;不敢讓帝王者,德性也。故曰:「朝廷莫如爵,J23nB120_p0050a21輔世長民莫如德。」又曰:「當仁不讓於師。」又曰:「自天子J23nB120_p0050a22以至於庶人,壹是皆以修身為本。」故文王,人君也。而J23nB120_p0050a23純亦不己,可以配天;仲尼,匹夫也,而祖述憲章,不名J23nB120_p0050a24僭竊。且父之生子也,誰不欲子之克肖者?天主既為J23nB120_p0050b01大父,實生於人,乃不欲人之肖之,何哉?
J23nB120_p0050b02其言曰:「知者之心,含天地、具萬物,非真天地、萬物之J23nB120_p0050b03體也。若止水明鏡,影諸萬物,乃謂明鏡止水,均有天J23nB120_p0050b04地,即能造作之,豈可乎?天主,萬物之原,能生萬物。若J23nB120_p0050b05人即與之同,當亦能生之。」徵曰:止水明鏡之影萬物J23nB120_p0050b06也,鏡水在此,萬物在彼。有分劑,有方隅,故知是影而J23nB120_p0050b07非體也。心之含天地、具萬物也,汝可指心之方隅分J23nB120_p0050b08劑,猶如彼鏡與水乎?若心無形朕,不能生萬物者,天J23nB120_p0050b09主亦無形朕,胡能生萬物也?若天主無形而能形形,J23nB120_p0050b10心獨不可無形而形形乎?
J23nB120_p0050b11其言曰:「有在物之內分,如陰陽是也;有在物之外分,J23nB120_p0050b12如作者之類是也。天主作物,則在物之外分矣。」徵曰:J23nB120_p0050b13天主作天地萬物,必在天地萬物之外。如匠作器皿,J23nB120_p0050b14必在器皿之外。是固然矣。然則天主有方隅也、有分J23nB120_p0050b15劑也,原非遍一切也。則必有分段也、有變遷也。何以J23nB120_p0050b16無始無終,能為萬世主乎?
J23nB120_p0050b17其言曰:「形者在所,故能充乎所。神無形,則何以滿其J23nB120_p0050b18所乎?一粒之大,萬神宅焉。豈惟往者,將來靈魂並容J23nB120_p0050b19不礙也。」徵曰:神之無形,善乎其言之矣。然無形則無J23nB120_p0050b20往來,亦無數目,亦無生滅。而曰靈魂天主所生,其可J23nB120_p0050b21乎哉?
J23nB120_p0050b22其言曰:「化生天地萬物,乃大公之父也。又時主宰而J23nB120_p0050b23安養之,乃無上共君也。世人弗仰弗奉,則無父、無君,J23nB120_p0050b24至無孝、至無忠也。」徵曰:夫世間之法,決無全能。故天J23nB120_p0050c01地能覆載而不能炤明;日月能炤明而不能生育;父J23nB120_p0050c02母能生育而不能教誨;師友能教誨而不能賞罰;君J23nB120_p0050c03主能賞罰而不能無漏網;鬼神賞罰無漏網而又不J23nB120_p0050c04能覆載炤明等。若天主果有全能也,則直以天主覆J23nB120_p0050c05載、炤臨、生育、教誨、賞罰之而可矣。又何用天、地、日、月、J23nB120_p0050c06君、親、鬼、神為?若猶待天覆地載,乃至親生君治之也,J23nB120_p0050c07則天主全能安在?今現見人之生也,天覆之、地載之,J23nB120_p0050c08日月炤臨之、父生之,母育之,國君統治之、鬼神昭鑒J23nB120_p0050c09保護之。顧不知感其恩德,獨推恩於漠無見聞之天J23nB120_p0050c10主,謂之大父、大君。既謂之大父、大君,則必以吾父、吾J23nB120_p0050c11君為小父、小君矣,豈不至無孝、至無忠哉?又設謂天J23nB120_p0050c12主全能,即寄於天、地、日、月、君、親、鬼、神,如國主寄全用J23nB120_p0050c13於公、卿、牧、長。則庶民有善,官宰賞之可矣;庶民有罪,J23nB120_p0050c14官宰罰之可矣,豈事事必經國主哉?又庶民之所承J23nB120_p0050c15事,亦但承事官宰無違,即為承事國主矣。豈必獨事J23nB120_p0050c16一主而禁其承事官宰哉?今謂仙、佛僭竊,禁不承事,J23nB120_p0050c17猶之可也。天、地、日、月、鬼、神,固天主所造,以覆載炤護J23nB120_p0050c18人者,而亦禁其拜祭,不亦異乎?
J23nB120_p0050c19其言曰:「人心性命,原天主所賦也。」徵曰:天命之謂性。J23nB120_p0050c20紫陽之解甚謬,吾已釋大意於前矣。夫可賦者,必其J23nB120_p0050c21有形者也。心性有何形像而可賦乎?若無形像而仍J23nB120_p0050c22可賦,則天主靈明,亦必有賦之者矣。又可賦則可奪,J23nB120_p0050c23云何有始而無終乎?
J23nB120_p0050c24其言曰:「必先有物,而後有理。引詩云『有物、有則。』」徵曰:J23nB120_p0051a01夫理者,貫於物之終始,而能成物者也。故曰誠者物J23nB120_p0051a02之終始,不誠無物。《詩》所謂有物有則,正繇從理成物,J23nB120_p0051a03故即物是理。如金作器,器全是金也。若言先有物而J23nB120_p0051a04後有理,則未有物時便無理耶?既無物即無理,則無J23nB120_p0051a05天地時尤必無理。而天主在天地先,乃無理之尤甚J23nB120_p0051a06者也。
J23nB120_p0051a07其言曰:「必有無始,而後有有始;有無形,而後能形形。J23nB120_p0051a08吾身之先,必有父母生我。必有天主降衷於我。」徵曰:J23nB120_p0051a09無始無形,快哉論也!若天主無始,則父母亦無始乎?J23nB120_p0051a10天主無形,則父母亦無形乎?或解之曰:「父母有形,故J23nB120_p0051a11有始。天主無形,故無始也。」徵曰:吾身有形,故有始。吾J23nB120_p0051a12心性無形,何為不無始乎?
J23nB120_p0051a13其言曰:「天地猶一宮室也。宮室、樓臺必待有主製造J23nB120_p0051a14而後成。曾是天地之大,無有主之者,竟能自造自成J23nB120_p0051a15乎?」徵曰:宮室未成時,主及工匠,依地依廠。天地未成J23nB120_p0051a16時,天主何依耶?又宮室則用土木瓦石成之,天地用J23nB120_p0051a17何物成之耶?又未有天地,先有成天地之料耶?此料J23nB120_p0051a18為本有之?為天主生之耶?且安置何所耶?為在天主J23nB120_p0051a19身內?為在外耶?若在身外,則天主不遍一切;若在身J23nB120_p0051a20內,不幾戕賊其身,而以為天地萬物耶?
J23nB120_p0051a21其言曰:「太極之說,不過理、氣二字。未嘗言其有靈知J23nB120_p0051a22覺,明也。既無靈覺,何以主宰萬化?」徵曰:孔子不言「易J23nB120_p0051a23有太極,是生兩儀」乎?夫易即靈明知覺之本性也,故J23nB120_p0051a24無思、無為,寂然不動,感而遂通。然正不必以此主宰J23nB120_p0051b01萬化。若萬化定有主宰,則但化善而不化惡,但化樂J23nB120_p0051b02而不化苦。聖人修道之教,反為無用矣。
J23nB120_p0051b03其言曰:「儒云:『物物各具一太極』,則太極與物同體。囿J23nB120_p0051b04於物而不得為天地主。」徵曰:太極妙理,無分劑、無方J23nB120_p0051b05隅,故物物各得其全,全體在物而不囿於物也。孔子J23nB120_p0051b06曰:「範圍天地之化而不過,曲成萬物而不遺。通乎晝J23nB120_p0051b07夜之道而知。」此之謂也。汝謂獨一天主,不與物同體,J23nB120_p0051b08則必高居物表,有分劑、有方隅矣,何謂無所不在?
J23nB120_p0051b09其言曰:「人為天主所生,悉啟翼於善。或乃為惡,則同J23nB120_p0051b10人所自造。」徵曰:天主既有全能,何以好善而人不善,J23nB120_p0051b11惡惡而人反惡?或救之曰:「如父母生子,但欲其善,不J23nB120_p0051b12欲其惡。子偏作惡,父母何辜?」徵曰:父母生子身,不生J23nB120_p0051b13子心性,故不得自在也。天主既生其心性,何不但生J23nB120_p0051b14善心性耶?
J23nB120_p0051b15其言曰:「天主生物,欲以養人。生人,欲以事主。」徵曰:天J23nB120_p0051b16主既無始,無始何人事之?而忽起生人事己之想?又J23nB120_p0051b17父母生子,為防老死。天主既無終,生人何用?
J23nB120_p0051b18其言曰:「人之生從何來?死從何去?」徵曰:此佛氏嘗談J23nB120_p0051b19也,亦吾儒秘旨也。而用之則大異矣。孔子曰:「原始反J23nB120_p0051b20終」,故知死生之說。精氣為物,遊魂為變,是故知鬼神J23nB120_p0051b21之情狀。逮季路問事鬼神,則曰:「未能事人,焉能事鬼?」J23nB120_p0051b22「敢問死。」則曰:「未知生,焉知死?」繇此觀之,生死無二理,J23nB120_p0051b23人鬼無二致,明矣。「朝聞道而夕死可者」,謂其死而有J23nB120_p0051b24不死者存也。既死而不死,則生必不生,而謂天主賦J23nB120_p0051c01之始生,可乎?
J23nB120_p0051c02其言曰:「天主降生之時,第以本性之原體,結合於吾J23nB120_p0051c03人之性體。譬之以梨接桃,梨藉桃以生,桃何嘗損其J23nB120_p0051c04本體?」徵曰:彼謂人之性靈皆天主造。而今以桃、梨譬J23nB120_p0051c05之,將謂世間之梨,皆桃所生乎?梨本桃生,何須待接?J23nB120_p0051c06待接方生,則桃本不能生梨矣。
J23nB120_p0051c07其言曰:「天主未降生千百年前,已豫示必降之兆。及J23nB120_p0051c08其將降,又有天神來報。乃至種種奇功異瑞。其書充J23nB120_p0051c09棟,特未傳譯」等。徵曰:此與釋氏所述佛生瑞應何異J23nB120_p0051c10也?若謂釋迦為摩耶所生,不過是人。則天主為聖女J23nB120_p0051c11所生,獨非人乎?若謂耶穌定是天主降生,則安知釋J23nB120_p0051c12迦非天主降生乎?若謂佛氏經書荒偽,則汝書安知J23nB120_p0051c13不荒偽乎?若謂汝書歷歷有據,則佛經不亦自謂歷J23nB120_p0051c14歷有據乎?若謂佛出西域,此間無人見聞,便稱為謬。J23nB120_p0051c15則汝出大西,此間尤無人見,不尤謬乎?佛書從天竺J23nB120_p0051c16來,汝則以為誤取。汝謂九萬里來,誰知其非說謊乎?J23nB120_p0051c17汝既孤身至此,去家已遠,歷年已久,何繇與汝交者,J23nB120_p0051c18猶有本國異物贈之?豈汝膂力甚大,當日所攜之物J23nB120_p0051c19如此其多耶?抑有神通,朝取而夕至耶?抑有奇術,隨J23nB120_p0051c20意能變造耶?吾亦聞汝之根底矣。生於近香山岳之J23nB120_p0051c21小國,聰明奸究,意在覬覦中原神器,故泛海潛至嶺J23nB120_p0051c22南。先學此方聲字,然後竊讀三教群書,牽佛附儒,杜J23nB120_p0051c23撰扭捏,創此邪教以為惑世誑民蠹壞國運之本。自J23nB120_p0051c24謂絕婬不娶而以領聖水之妄說,誘彼愚夫愚婦私J23nB120_p0052a01行穢鄙。然閩粵民庶,每年必與呂宋等國商賈往來。J23nB120_p0052a02汝之羽翼,每年附舟賚、送寶物以相資給。是故與汝J23nB120_p0052a03交者,汝不希彼一毫供養,更以異物而贈惠之。人遂J23nB120_p0052a04謂汝廉潔無求,勝彼釋、老之勸人布施。乃至縉紳達J23nB120_p0052a05士,亦被汝惑。以為恭、愨、廉、退,儼然大儒風格。嗚呼!安J23nB120_p0052a06知王莽謙恭,乃漢室之賊,介甫新學,實宋世之蠹哉!J23nB120_p0052a07汝之心術亦太惡矣。
J23nB120_p0052a08其言曰:「物或有始終,如草、木、鳥、獸;或有始而無終,如J23nB120_p0052a09天、地、神、鬼及人之靈魂。惟天主無始無終,而能始終J23nB120_p0052a10萬物。無天主則無物矣」。徵曰:吾儒謂誠者物之終始,J23nB120_p0052a11不誠無物。其次致曲,曲能有誠,誠則形。乃至惟天下J23nB120_p0052a12至誠為能化。至誠之道,可以前知。至誠如神,至誠能J23nB120_p0052a13盡其性,能盡人物之性,贊化育而參天地。故先以二J23nB120_p0052a14語定其宗趣,所謂「自誠明,謂之性;自明誠,謂之教。」而J23nB120_p0052a15又結示性修不二,天人合一之旨,故曰:「誠則明矣,明J23nB120_p0052a16則誠矣。」此真物化根源,非所謂天主也。若必立一天J23nB120_p0052a17主,至靈至聖,無所不能,威權不二,則化育決無勞贊,J23nB120_p0052a18而天地決不可參,豈理也哉!又彼所立有始有終、有J23nB120_p0052a19始無終、無始無終三句,尤為不通。易曰:「形而上者謂J23nB120_p0052a20之道,形而下者謂之器。」器則有始必有終,道則無終J23nB120_p0052a21必無始。既許有始無終一句,何不并立無始有終一J23nB120_p0052a22句耶?且草木與鳥獸,其不同甚矣,猶皆有始有終。人J23nB120_p0052a23之所以異於禽獸者幾希耳,獨有始而無終,何耶?又J23nB120_p0052a24世間之法,父子必相類,因果必相同。現見人決生人,J23nB120_p0052b01鳥決生鳥,瓜不生豆,豆不生瓜。天主既生人也,人有J23nB120_p0052b02始無終,天主亦必有始而無終矣。若天主靈妙,故無J23nB120_p0052b03始,則人心亦靈妙,何謂獨有始乎?若人心靈妙,天主J23nB120_p0052b04賦之,則天主靈妙,安知不亦有賦之者乎?又天主生J23nB120_p0052b05人,則謂人之大父也。生鳥獸,不為鳥獸父乎?生草木,J23nB120_p0052b06不為草木父乎?鳥、獸、草、木之父,亦何足為尊主乎?
J23nB120_p0052b07其言曰:「譬如樹之花、果、枝、葉及榦,皆繇根生,無根則J23nB120_p0052b08皆無。乃樹之根,固無他根所繇生也。天主是萬物根J23nB120_p0052b09底。何所繇生?」徵曰:樹根必依地者也。天主獨能無所J23nB120_p0052b10依乎?
J23nB120_p0052b11其言曰:「天主當初欲生萬物,以為人用。先開闢天地,J23nB120_p0052b12化生萬物之諸宗,然後化生一男一女等。」徵曰:天地J23nB120_p0052b13未闢,尚未有人。云何欲生萬物以為人用乎?
J23nB120_p0052b14其言曰:「生前為善、為惡,其魂各以死後赴天主審判。」J23nB120_p0052b15徵曰:若天主無形、聲、處所,則死者將何所赴?若可赴J23nB120_p0052b16聽審判,殆如世間士師,亦如釋氏所稱閻羅。然設如J23nB120_p0052b17士師,則士師亦父母所生,不免老死者也。設如閻羅,J23nB120_p0052b18則閻羅亦眾生數目,不免輪迴者也,猶可稱無始無J23nB120_p0052b19終,造物之真宰耶?
J23nB120_p0052b20其言曰:「天堂、地獄之報決不可免。所以定有後世。無J23nB120_p0052b21有一人能憶前世事者,所以定無前世。」徵曰:執途之J23nB120_p0052b22人而問以初生時事,亦無一人能憶之者,可謂并無J23nB120_p0052b23初生事乎?初生雖不憶,不可謂無初生。前世雖不憶,J23nB120_p0052b24又安知無前世也?
J23nB120_p0052c01其言曰:「仙、佛、菩薩,令人奉敬自己而抗天主之權。」徵J23nB120_p0052c02曰:仙、佛、菩薩,雖非吾儒所宗,然必說有諸仙、諸佛、諸J23nB120_p0052c03菩薩等以為世人所敬。又說天、地、日、月、星辰、鬼、神皆J23nB120_p0052c04應奉事。則非專奉自己也。耶穌乃令人專奉一主,不J23nB120_p0052c05得拜祭天、地、日、月等,其專利嫉妒不尤甚乎?
J23nB120_p0052c06J23nB120_p0052c07J23nB120_p0052c08天學再徵
附
J23nB120_p0053a02鍾振之居士寄初徵與際明禪師柬
J23nB120_p0053a03憶吾兩人,生同一日,學同一師,幼同一志。不謂尊者J23nB120_p0053a04至廿四歲,逃儒入禪。二十年來,所趨各別,音問遂疏。J23nB120_p0053a05茲者病臥湖濱,忽聞天主邪說。借彼矛,攻彼盾,略為J23nB120_p0053a06《初徵》。知尊者久事禪學,必有破敵餘才。且彼既專攻J23nB120_p0053a07佛教,尊者似亦不容默默。拙稿呈政,惟進而教之。
際明禪師復柬
J23nB120_p0053a09方外雲蹤,久失聞問。而髫年千古之志,則未敢或忘J23nB120_p0053a10也。接手教,兼讀《初徵》,快甚!居士擔當聖學,正應出此J23nB120_p0053a11手眼。山衲既棄世法,不必更為辯論。若謂彼攻佛教,J23nB120_p0053a12佛教實非彼所能破。且今時釋子,有名無義者多,藉J23nB120_p0053a13此外難以警悚之,未必非佛法之幸也!刀不磨不利,J23nB120_p0053a14鐘不擊不鳴。三武滅僧,而佛法益盛。山衲且拭目俟J23nB120_p0053a15之矣。草復不既。
鍾振之寄再徵柬
J23nB120_p0053a17曩寄《天學初徵》呈政,意尊者必出手眼,共閑聖道。而J23nB120_p0053a18竟袖手旁觀,豈髫年千古之志,與世法俱棄耶?何謂J23nB120_p0053a19未敢或忘也?邇來邪說益熾,不得已再為之徵。必祈J23nB120_p0053a20為我斟酌。毋曰:「爾既不歸投佛法,吾亦不預聞儒宗J23nB120_p0053a21也。」
際明禪師復柬
J23nB120_p0053a23儒、釋二家,同而復異、異而復同,惟智人能深究之,非J23nB120_p0053a24邪說可混淆也。惟真儒方能知佛;亦惟學佛始能知J23nB120_p0053b01儒。讀居士《再徵》,其揭理處,如日輪中天;其破邪處,如J23nB120_p0053b02基箭射柳。孔、顏一脈,可謂不墜地矣。山衲豈能更贊J23nB120_p0053b03一辭?惟冀居士以此慧性,更復深究西竺心傳,則世J23nB120_p0053b04出世道,均為有賴。形跡雖疏,神交匪隔。當不以我為J23nB120_p0053b05狂言也。
闢邪集跋語
J23nB120_p0053b10余嘗讀《觀所緣緣論》,先展轉縱奪以破外人,然後中J23nB120_p0053b11立正義。倘外計未破,不應先主自宗。譬以良將用兵,J23nB120_p0053b12先以威伏,後以慈撫也。近日天主之教淺陋,殆不呈J23nB120_p0053b13言。彼翕然信向者,達士不過為利所惑,庸人不過望J23nB120_p0053b14風超影,皆無足怪。獨惜夫破之者,不能借矛攻盾,往J23nB120_p0053b15往先自立宗,反未免齎盜糧而藉寇兵耳。惟茲二《徵》,J23nB120_p0053b16絕不自軌一法,惟乘其釁而攻之,大似尉遲、敬德,裸J23nB120_p0053b17身赤手入陣而奪矛取勝。其以臨濟白拈賊之心裏J23nB120_p0053b18者耶?乞集一出可以破邪,可以匡世,可以閑聖道,可J23nB120_p0053b19以獲 國運,利亦偉矣。爰不揣庸劣,評而梓之。
J23nB120_p0053b20新安夢士程智用謹跋